They Put Her in to Fix It. Now Watch How They Treat Her.

June 2, 2026

She is also the second Black woman in a decade to be handed a broken institution and expected to make it whole.

Denise Jones Gregory became the permanent president of Jackson State University on May 1 — after spending a year in the interim role stabilizing an institution that has cycled through four presidents in six years. Her predecessors left under circumstances ranging from financial scandal to a prostitution sting arrest to two unexplained sudden resignations. She is inheriting a student housing shortage, frayed alumni relationships, ongoing building renovations behind schedule, and an institution under pressure from a federal administration actively hostile to the HBCU mission. She is also receiving something none of her predecessors got: a year of outside leadership coaching, part of a $97,500 contract Mississippi Institutions of Higher Learning signed with AGB Search.

That coaching is being framed as support. It is worth asking why that support wasn’t available when the institution needed it most — and whether the pattern of who gets placed in these roles, under what conditions, and with what resources reveals something the framing of “fresh start” tends to obscure.

University presidents are serving shorter tenures than ever. According to the American Council on Education, the average presidential tenure has fallen from 8.5 years two decades ago to 5.9 years today. That contraction is happening across higher education, but it is landing with particular force at HBCUs — institutions already navigating state lawmakers scrutinizing their outcomes, a federal administration that has pushed universities to dismantle DEI programs, and research funding threats that disproportionately affect institutions with smaller endowments and thinner financial margins. The presidency has become, as George Mason University professor Judith Wilde put it, a job that is no longer Monday through Friday, nine to five. “I don’t think any president, even if they’ve been president before, is ready to become a president right now,” she said.

That context matters enormously for what Gregory is walking into. But there is a layer of this story that the coverage keeps noting without fully naming. Felecia Commodore, an education policy professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign who studies HBCUs, identified it directly: women presidents, particularly Black women, are scrutinized for their ability to lead in ways their male counterparts are not. And a specific pattern keeps repeating — after periods of crisis or scandal at an institution, Black women are placed in interim or permanent leadership roles and expected to fix everything the previous administration broke, often without the structural support, board alignment, or alumni trust that would make that expectation realistic.

Gregory is the second woman in a decade to hold the permanent title at Jackson State. She is a JSU alumna. She spent a year as interim president building relationships, learning the institution, and demonstrating the kind of steady commitment that the role has not always rewarded. The incoming JSU National Alumni Association president Earlexia Norwood said the coaching Gregory is receiving is well overdue — and that all the support possible should be given to her, just as support is given to all Mississippi university presidents. That last clause is the argument. The support that is being treated as exceptional for Gregory should have been standard. The fact that it wasn’t — for her and for the presidents before her — is part of why Jackson State has had four leaders in six years.

Gregory has said she hopes to bring stability. She is breaking ground on a new dining hall with a 550-person capacity. Housing projects are ongoing and set to complete next year. She is working to expand scholarships and sustain donor support. She is doing the work. The question the institution — and the board that oversees it — needs to answer is whether it will do its part. Stability at Jackson State does not depend only on who is in the president’s office. It depends on whether the systems surrounding that office are finally prepared to function the way they should have been functioning all along.