A New York law that took effect June 9, 2026, requires advertisers to disclose when a synthetic performer — a computer-generated human figure created using AI or other software algorithms — appears in an advertisement. The law, Senate Bill S8420A, signed by Governor Kathy Hochul in December 2025, applies to any person or company that creates or produces an advertisement for commercial purposes with actual knowledge that a synthetic performer is in it. Violations carry civil penalties of $1,000 for first offenses and $5,000 for subsequent violations.
The law is narrow by design. It does not apply to digital replicas of identifiable real people — those are governed by a separate law, also signed the same day, expanding New York’s right of publicity to deceased performers. It does not apply to AI-generated product images, backgrounds, or objects without human figures. It applies specifically to computer-generated non-identifiable human performers: AI-generated people who look like people but are not people, appearing in advertisements in ways that could create the impression of a real human performance.
The disclosure requirement exists because the problem it is designed to solve is real and growing. Generative AI has made it significantly cheaper and faster to produce advertising content featuring human figures without hiring human models, actors, or voice talent. Surveys consistently show consumer discomfort with AI-generated advertisements — including public backlash against specific campaigns — and 90% of Americans say they want news and advertising organizations to disclose when AI was used to create the content they are consuming.
The compliance architecture the law creates is more complicated than the disclosure requirement suggests. The law imposes the obligation only when the advertiser has “actual knowledge” that a synthetic performer is in the advertisement. Legal analysts have noted that this standard creates an incentive for advertisers to avoid learning whether their content is AI-generated — a structure that rewards willful ignorance over transparency. The New York Attorney General’s office was expected to issue guidance on acceptable disclosure formats by April 2026; that guidance will shape how the law functions in practice.
The law is also arriving inside a federal environment actively resisting state AI regulation. A Trump executive order signed December 11, 2025, seeks to establish a unified national AI regulatory framework that minimizes state-level variation. Whether New York’s disclosure requirements survive federal challenge is an open legal question.
What is not an open question is the structural dynamic the law is responding to. The advertising industry is in the early stages of a transition in which AI-generated human figures can substitute for human performers in commercial production. The question of whether consumers have a right to know when that substitution has occurred — and whether the performers who would have been hired have any claim on the value being extracted from their displaced labor — is a question the law is beginning to answer, imperfectly and incompletely, one disclosure requirement at a time.
New York is not the only state asking it. California, Illinois, and Tennessee have enacted or expanded right-of-publicity laws addressing AI and digital replication. SAG-AFTRA’s collective bargaining agreements now expressly address the creation and use of digital replicas, including consent, notice, and compensation requirements. The patchwork is building from the states up. The federal framework that would supersede it is being designed to slow that process down. The performers whose labor is being replaced are in the middle of both.
— SSC News Desk | Social Storytellers Collective
Get SSC analysis delivered to your inbox every day. Subscribe free on Beehiiv: socialstorytellerscollective.beehiiv.com